Figures lie and liars figure, former Gophers football coach Glen Mason was fond of saying. It was a polite way of expressing how he felt about statistics, which – true – can sometimes be misleading.
Sometimes, though, they tell you a lot about the level of dominance that happens within a game. For instance:
*957 to 546: That’s the combined yardage by which the Gophers (489-303) and Vikings (468-243) were outgained Saturday and Sunday.
The sentiment at the end of each of these games was quite different, as Gophers fans could at least relish the team’s resiliency against a very good opponent while Vikings fans were left to gripe about laying an egg against a Bears team poised to give up on its season.
But the bottom line in each was quite similar. Both were close games in that they ended with the local team within one possession, though losing in each case. And both final scores, in some ways, obscured the dominance of the opponent.
With due respect to Gophers linebacker De’Vondre Campbell, who confidently talked postgame about Minnesota being the better team and the Gophers dooming themselves with their own mistakes, the Buckeyes made more than their share, too. Minnesota earned respect, but Ohio State’s playmakers showed up in that yardage disparity.
The Vikings? They were nearly doubled up in yardage and at one point were being outgained 453-144. In all six of their losses this season, they’ve been held under 300 yards of offense – a stat that perfectly illustrates the widespread flaws on that unit, from the line, to quarterback, to receivers, to coaching.
For our money, the coaching and offensive line can take about 60 percent of the blame, while the play of Teddy Bridgewater and his receivers can take the rest. However you dice it, though, this is an offense that is flat-out bad.
Sorry, but this is EXACTLY the game I was expecting and predicted from the moment most people started assuming that the Bears were beatable because they had just become the first team since the 1923 Rochester Jeffersons to give up 50 points in back-to-back games.
The Vikings were riding their first two-game win streak since 2012 and were coming out of a bye. They had beaten the Bucs and Washington and the mood was unrealistically high for a 4-5 team without a signature win over a team with a winning record. Meanwhile, the mood was too low for a Bears team that had to play Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers in back-to-back games.
Yes, the Bears were outscored 107-37 by those two teams. But the Vikings also were outscored 72-17 by those two teams. And the game was in Chicago, so this, to me, was an easy game to pick based on how the NFL works. When you’re at the level that these two 4-6 teams are, up comes down rather quickly and down goes up at the same rate.
The Bears were humiliated and played like a team that was tired of being humiliated. They converted 10 of 17 third downs, mainly by throwing to big receivers over the top of little corners who were stranded in too many man calls.
Defensively, the Bears held the Vikings to 10 first downs, 21:22 in time of possession and 243 yards, 48 of which came on a fake punt run by backup safety Andrew Sendejo.
But just because the Vikings lost this game and are at 4-6 doesn’t mean some value can’t come out of this season. The playoffs never were a realistic proposition, especially after Adrian Peterson was lost after the first game.
The season can still be productive if Teddy Bridgewater learns from games like this and improves, which I think he will. Defensively, a lot can be gained by playing coach Mike Zimmer’s defense for the full season and coming back next year with a full understanding and some upgrades at some positions.
So, bottom line, it was what I expected today. But it’s not a total disaster, especially with three straight home games coming up.
Vikings running back Adrian Peterson, in a statement through the NFL Players Association, denied that he backed out of Friday’s hearing and claimed the pre-discipline meeting wasn’t part of the collective bargaining agreement.
The NFLPA release the lengthy statement on Sunday morning after a report was released by ESPN said the 2012 NFL MVP and the NFLPA did not attend a meeting scheduled by the NFL to further investigate Peterson’s felony charge of injury to a child. He pleaded no contest to a reckless assault misdemeanor last week.
Peterson will miss his ninth game this season when the Vikings face the Bears as he sits on the exempt list. Peterson awaits a conference call on Monday between the NFLPA, the NFL and arbitrator Shyam Das that will determine whether he will be reinstated to the Vikings based off an agreement made with the NFL.
Here’s Peterson’s entire statement, released by the NFLPA:
The report that I backed out of a meeting with the NFL is just not true. When Roger Goodell’s office asked that I attend the “hearing” on Friday, I consulted with my union and learned that this “hearing” was something new and inconsistent with the CBA. On Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday of this past week, my union sent emails, letters, and had conversations with his office on my behalf asking about the nature of the hearing, how it was to occur, who would participate, and its purpose. We repeatedly asked them to respond quickly to my questions because I want to cooperate and get back on the field, but they didn’t respond until late Wednesday evening, and even then they didn’t answer important questions about their proposed “hearing.”
After consulting with the union, I told the NFL that I will attend the standard meeting with the Commissioner prior to possible imposition of discipline, as has been the long-term practice under the CBA, but I wouldn’t participate in a newly created and non-collectively bargained pre-discipline “hearing” that would include outside people I don’t know and who would have roles in the process that the NFL wouldn’t disclose. At this point, I’ve resolved my matter in the criminal court; I’ve worked to make amends for what I’ve done; I’ve missed most of the season, and I stand ready to be candid and forthcoming with Mr. Goodell about what happened. However, I will not allow the NFL to impose a new process of discipline on me, ignore the CBA, ignore the deal they agreed to with me, and behave without fairness or accountability. The process they are pushing is arbitrary, inconsistent, and contrary to what they agreed to do, and for those reasons, I never agreed to the hearing.
I’m sorry for all of this, but I can’t excuse their refusal to be fair.