Chad Greenway jumped on SiriusXM NFL Radio on Wednesday, discussing a wide range of topics during the slowest period in the NFL. Among some of the click-bait questions, the linebacker was asked whether running back Adrian Peterson can still win an NFL MVP award.
“Yes. Why not?” Greenway responded. “It’s Adrian. He can do anything. I still tend to lean towards the fact that we’ve gotten so much preseason publicity is because of our quarterback. Unfortunately for running backs, it’s just like the 4-3 outside linebacker, it’s an undervalued position. As good as he is and as great as he’s been and as good as he can be this year, publicity wise in the NFL it’s driven by quarterbacks. If you don’t have a good one, you don’t have much of a chance.”
While, yes, it is true that the running back and 4-3 outside linebacker positions have been devalued in today’s NFL, Peterson is in a category of his own. There’s a reason why the Vikings wanted to keep him around after all the off-the-field headlines over the last year. Peterson is valuable, and it’s hard to see him not having a good season after playing just one game in 2014.
Peterson won the league’s MVP honors in 2012 in his return from a torn ACL the previous season to rush for 2,097 yards, averaging six yards per carry, and 12 touchdowns. Who knows whether Peterson, 30, will come eight yards short of the NFL’s single-season rushing record this year, or possibly even shatter Eric Dickerson’s record set in 1984 (2,105 yards), but Peterson was in excellent shape when he returned to Winter Park for OTAs and minicamp.
It’s a nice tandem the Vikings have offensively with Peterson and quarterback Teddy Bridgewater, and it’s clear from Greenway’s comments that Bridgewater has gained the attention and respect from the locker room based on his play last year. Even if Peterson doesn’t win MVP, it should be a fun offense to watch if those two key pieces stay healthy.
Almost every single sporting event amounts to a series of close calls, near-misses, 50-50 judgments by officials and fortune doled out one way or another — and taken advantage of or not.
This is particularly true of sports in which there is little scoring: hockey, baseball, football (which tries to pretend it is a higher-scoring sport by giving out six points for one score) and yes, of course, soccer (which takes the brunt of low-scoring jokes and should quite possibly start awarding seven points for a goal so it could have bigger scores like 14-7 instead of 2-1).
If you have a sport in which scoring is precious, you are likely going to have a handful of key moments in every game that could go either way — and are probably going to play a large role in determining the outcome. Sometimes it’s a ball or puck off the goalpost … or a ball that lands a couple inches foul … or a pass just a few inches too far for its intended target. But often times it’s a judgment call by an official: pass interference or no? Ball or strike on that 3-2 pitch? Interference penalty and a power play or just a clean check? Some of this messiness has been mitigated by instant replay, but we still rely very heavily on the human element.
In soccer, this manifests itself with perhaps the most important judgment call of all: whether or not to award a penalty kick. There are guidelines to determine when a foul qualifies as a PK, but in the heat of the moment it often must be a wrenching decision to make. Players are selling it. Angles are tough. It’s hard but vital to get it right because a goal in soccer is so very precious.
That brings us to last night’s U.S. vs. Germany Women’s World Cup semifinal. Germany was awarded a penalty kick in the second half of a scoreless game after American defender Julie Johnston was called for a hand ball in the penalty area. The call was mostly correct, though Johnston very easily could have been given a red card instead of simply a yellow, which would have left the Americans a player short the rest of the way. But it wasn’t called that way … and Germany missed the PK … and the match stayed completely even.
Not long after, Alex Morgan made a dash up the middle of the field for the U.S. and was taken down near the penalty area. She dove, fell in a heap, and a PK was rewarded to the Americans. My initial reaction was that there was no way it was the proper call, and I was stunned as they lined up for the penalty instead of a try from 19 or 20 yards out. Replays confirmed that the awarding of the penalty was, at best, iffy — and if we’re being honest, incorrect.
But that was the call. Carli Lloyd calmly took the kick and buried it for a 1-0 U.S. lead. I tweeted that the penalty was not well-earned but the kick was certainly well-taken, and it was met with a dose of angst and skepticism from some U.S. fans.
Perhaps saying it wasn’t earned was a bit too far, but the reaction underscores how a lot of us watch sports these days, I think: with every good break justified and every bad break an outrage. The mere suggestion that the U.S. didn’t fully earn it’s PK, in the eyes of some, would diminish the goal and taint the victory — so let’s never speak of it that way.
But really, that’s not true. As noted before, these are the very plays that determine almost every game. Some are more front-and-center than others, but regardless: it doesn’t diminish or cheapen an accomplishment to admit your team received some good fortune along the way because that’s fundamental to pretty much every win in a game like this.
At the same time, I also reflected on the tweet after the fact and recognized that as a journalist I’m strangely situated to watch games through an objective lens, even when I have a rooting interest and no working interest. As such, I would imagine I am quick to judge what is a break or what isn’t a break even if it casts the team I’m rooting for in the “lucky” category. (Famous personal example: My blog post from five years ago in which I honestly determined that Drew Pearson did not really push off after watching the play repeatedly). This probably makes me really fun to be around (though anyone who has watched me watch a Vikings game knows that the veil of objectivity can be lifted quickly and with vulgarity).
Maybe it’s no fun to think of sports as a series of random events determined partially by the skill and moxie of the competitors but so often by luck and judgment (or maybe that randomness is the very appeal of sports). Regardless, if you would have complained bitterly about the penalty that ultimately led to the winning goal for the U.S. had it happened the other way around, it is fair (perhaps even essential) to acknowledge the tremendous break as a gift.
It is nothing that needs an apology attached to it. You get or overcome breaks. You win or lose as a result. That’s sports.
With the amount of injured Vikings linebackers during OTAs and minicamp, Brian Peters benefited with an increased amount of reps on defense last month.
The Northwestern product converted from safety to linebacker after college and played the last two seasons in the Canadian Football League with the Saskatchewan Roughriders. He signed with the Vikings during the offseason, hoping to land a spot on the 53-man roster as a special teams player and a depth piece at linebacker.
“Brian is doing a nice job with all the coverage aspects of where he’s supposed to be, you’d expect that from a converted safety,” Vikings head coach Mike Zimmer said. “The question is, when he gets the pads on how will he be in that area, so again, the physicality. But in shorts he’s doing a good job, he knows where to be, he can run, he’s pretty smart.”
Peters led the Roughriders last season with 78 tackles and also had three sacks, two interceptions, a forced fumble and a defensive touchdown. Anthony Barr, Gerald Hodges and Casey Matthews missed either some or all of the OTAs and minicamp sessions in June, which allowed Peters the opportunity to get more comfortable in Zimmer’s scheme. Peters is listed at 6-4 and 235 pounds, which makes him one the lightest linebackers on the roster outside of Brandon Watts and Eric Kendricks, but he brings those coverage skills to the position that are vital in today’s NFL.
“I think safeties feel a little more comfortable in there when they are matched up with tight ends and running backs opposed to a receiver,” defensive coordinator George Edwards said. “I think he’s comfortable with the match ups and like I said, the biggest thing is transferring it to running back, getting his reads and those kinds of things.”